Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 10:01
Run Duration437 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 933
85% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,975
122% 1,975 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.73
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 189
Parallax 201
142% 188 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 188
Splatting 126
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 435 232 205 197 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 446
Write 432
Mixed 396
SusWrite 279
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 346
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 133%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
14TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 237 237 240 246 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 239
Write 203
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 244
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 1.7
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 5.9
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 275 275 273 264 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 262
Write 246
Mixed 107
SusWrite 266
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 1.4
41% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 120 118 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 208
Write 187
Mixed 100
SusWrite 120
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.3
48% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.6
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
6TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 203 208 202 202 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 204
Write 195
Mixed 112
SusWrite 205
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.4
36% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 2.2
4% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDN 721010ALE604 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 249 243 247 237 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 242
Mixed 119
SusWrite 244
155% 212 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
313% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 140%
Great: 139%
Asmt ASM1352R-Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 140 143 148 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 99.7
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 144
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 122
Write 40.2
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 42.7
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 87%
BUFFALO HD-PATU3 1TB
931GB free, PID 021c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 113 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47% Average
Read 110
Write 73.9
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 112
119% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 30.4
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 10
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback