PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140721 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 25 '21 at 12:23 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
|
45.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reeinno ST120GB S4S3 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0809B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 91 63 45 32 29 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
45GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 92 106 112 93 MB/s
|
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
84GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 111 125 162 146 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
0GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
43%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 332x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 266x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 189x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 442x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 147x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $227 |