Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 189
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 541
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 31.8
20% 29.3 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 34
25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reeinno ST120GB S4S3 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0330B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 30 32 28 29 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 452
Write 183
Mixed 22
SusWrite 38.3
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 1.4
54% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
17% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
815GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 177 178 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 174
Mixed 110
SusWrite 177
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
2GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 17 3.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 1.3
Mixed 23
SusWrite 13.8
22% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
112% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback