Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 06:34
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 774
84% 665 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6601) ≥ 4GB; XFX SPEEDSTER QICK 319 AMD Radeon™ RX 6700 XT ULTRA
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 133
Parallax 287
116% 187 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 143
Splatting 167
143% 177 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 162
Mixed 202
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 33.3
141% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 160
132% 194 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
2GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 119
Write 105
Mixed 145
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 24.8
107% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 87.7
80% 125 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 80%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
0GB free
Firmware: 1111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,775
Write 2,009
Mixed 1,607
402% 1,797 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 294
4K Mixed 92.3
360% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 1984
DQ Mixed 1,228
1,000% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
5GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2243
Write 359
Mixed 1,515
300% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 75.5
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 110
386% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 1,966
DQ Mixed 1,134
970% 1,391 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB
1GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 257
Write 404
Mixed 166
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 33.1
145% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 67.4
97% 187 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 120%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 131
Write 105
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 75.9
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
5GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 84 64 75 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 73.3
Write 72.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 88.1
58% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 80.8
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
10GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 81.5
Write 5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 5.3
22% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 88%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
2GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 15.5
25% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 55%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
1GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 181
Write 28.5
Mixed 194
159% 135 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 37.8
3,765% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 41.2
4,255% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback