Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory28.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 00:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 277
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 774
82% 657 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 91.7
55% 74 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 46.9
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 86 2.7 52 108 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 410
Write 333
Mixed 121
SusWrite 80.4
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 9.7
49% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 28.7
41% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
257GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 127 129 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 126
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 129
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 109%
ST932032 0AS 320GB
275GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 34
Write 34.2
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 35.7
42% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.2% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback