Lenovo 20238

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20238  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 18:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 166
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 232
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 309 306 306 273 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 359
Write 239
Mixed 228
SusWrite 289
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 31.1
102% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 38.5
34% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19H Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20238 Builds (Compare 1,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback