Clevo W35_37ET

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemClevo W35_37ET  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W35_37ET
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 21:07
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 133
58% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 322
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Clevo(1558 3700) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 8.9
6% 9.27 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11
Splatting 9.7
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 369 334 243 240 238 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 414
Write 396
Mixed 369
SusWrite 295
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 321
236% 311 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
638GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 394 389 397 400 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 482
Write 399
Mixed 346
SusWrite 397
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 28.3
100% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 276
220% 305 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 125%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
515GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 79 83 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 68
Write 74.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 81.6
91% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W35_37ET Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W35_37ET

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback