Clevo W35_37ET

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Clevo W35_37ET (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO W35_37ET
Memory	20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 123 57% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 334 37% 290 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M 7,381 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Clevo(1558 3700) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 8.9 6% 9.27 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 11 Splatting 9.7 9% 11 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 450 301 260 446 449 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 409 Write 449 Mixed 370 SusWrite 392 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 30.6 106% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 327 243% 321 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 99%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$68 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 638GB free Firmware: M3CR032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 424 417 375 438 408 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 407 Mixed 352 SusWrite 418 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 29.8 103% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 291 228% 313 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.6 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W35_37ET Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Clevo W35_37ET

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	72x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	7x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	64x
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	26x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 51%, 1,341 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 470 samples	6x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16