Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 11 '21 at 23:29
Run Duration	406 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 122 56% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 330 35% 277 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 77.8 Reflection 84.4 Parallax 77.7 63% 80 fps	Gravity 81.3 Splatting 75.5 69% 78.4 fps
Poor: 51% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 266 231 188 173 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 438 Write 368 Mixed 343 SusWrite 197 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 40.9 140% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 262 189% 242 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 134%
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 457GB free Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 282 292 265 270 289 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 297 Write 394 Mixed 333 SusWrite 269 73% 323 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 30.6 116% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 256 181% 227 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 103%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 839GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 138 135 126 130 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 137 Write 132 Mixed 105 SusWrite 131 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 168 163 154 156 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 171 Mixed 120 SusWrite 158 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 126 122 115 117 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 123 Write 120 Mixed 95.8 SusWrite 118 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 87GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 79 78 80 77 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 98.7 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 79.4 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$44 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 927GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 100 95 96 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 108 Write 105 Mixed 59 SusWrite 97.5 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 76%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 90GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 71 SusWrite 15.5 114% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 136% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 72%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 931GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 83 73 78 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 94.7 Write 97.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 78.4 111% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 72%
WDC WD12 00JB-00GVA0 120GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 112GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 28.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 11.7 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 18%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 58GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.6 7.8 9.6 7.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	7.08% Terrible	Read 21 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 9.4 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 49% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 27%
Philips USB Flash Drive 124GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 115GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 22 22 19 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 98.7 Write 49.5 Mixed 40 SusWrite 21.2 61% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.6 104% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 26%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 119GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 32 34 30 32 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 190 Write 70 Mixed 96.4 SusWrite 32.6 111% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 8.2 821% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 18.9 DQ Mixed 11.5 1,096% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 113%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 13GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 56 36 51 37 39 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 92.4 Write 15.7 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 38 48% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.5 102% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 43%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 60GB free, PID 0119 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 10 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 18.2 Write 15.7 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 10.6 21% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3.2 205% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 18%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 8381 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 41 Write 21.7 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 13.2 26% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 39% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 20%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7 6.9 7 6.9 7.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 9 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 6.9 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 9%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.73% Terrible	Read 25.8 Write 3.2 Mixed 5 SusWrite 3.7 9% 9.43 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.73% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.4% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 17 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16