Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '21 at 00:53
Run Duration	450 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 134 61% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 347 35% 286 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 79.6 Parallax 80.7 60% 78.1 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 74.8 Splatting 72.5 59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 250 265 169 141 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 422 Write 392 Mixed 355 SusWrite 188 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 44.4 153% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 249 180% 230 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 134%
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 457GB free Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 247 262 306 325 309 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 282 Write 391 Mixed 326 SusWrite 267 72% 316 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 88.8 4K Mixed 33.3 126% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 264 191% 245 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 103%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 146 152 156 159 154 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 146 Write 144 Mixed 110 SusWrite 146 101% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.9 202% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 53GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 91 92 95 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 122 Write 119 Mixed 98.4 SusWrite 90 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 112 113 118 119 118 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 179 Write 164 Mixed 123 SusWrite 112 107% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 106 104 109 113 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 64 SusWrite 105 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 927GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 110 Write 105 Mixed 67 70% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 84GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 10 9.3 8.9 8.8 11 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 147 Write 143 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 10.7 116% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 136% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 72%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 279GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 60 64 65 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 57.7 Write 69.3 Mixed 47.9 SusWrite 60.9 81% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 72%
778 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 8GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 15 15 4.9 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.2% Terrible	Read 25.1 Write 5.3 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 14.4 14% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 10% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.2% Great: 35%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 58GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.2 9.2 9.8 9.7 9.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 24.8 Write 19 Mixed 5 SusWrite 10.3 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 27%
Philips USB Flash Drive 124GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 115GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 17 22 22 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 73.7 Write 26.3 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 20.2 38% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.5 78% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 26%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 119GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 33 31 32 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 188 Write 53.9 Mixed 120 SusWrite 31.8 114% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.2 256% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 113%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 15GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 94.8 Write 15.8 Mixed 28.8 45% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.3 80% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 43%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 60GB free, PID 0119 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.1 Write 16.3 Mixed 17.3 22% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3.2 206% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 18%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 8381 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 37.9 Write 22.8 Mixed 12 SusWrite 13.2 26% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 20%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 20.1 Write 8.8 Mixed 6.8 13% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 24.6 Write 3.3 Mixed 5 10% 11 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
General USB Flash Disk 125GB 371 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 116GB free, PID 8381 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 96.1 Write 63.5 Mixed 15 63% 58.2 MB/s	4K Write 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 13 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16