PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130715 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 22 '20 at 03:26 |
Run Duration | 416 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 261 255 221 217 212 MB/s
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB
457GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 261 305 302 287 301 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 155 159 158 154 158 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
414GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 119 120 119 120 121 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 125 128 128 127 127 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
28.5%
Poor
|
||||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32
927GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 103 102 101 103 MB/s
|
61%
Good
|
|||
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB
84GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 11 11 10 11 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB
931GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 73 79 82 74 85 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD64 00BPVT-00HXZT1 640GB
250GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 27 27 27 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD12 00JB-00GVA0 120GB
112GB free, PID 2506
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
|||
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.8 6.9 7 6.9 6.9 MB/s
|
6.57%
Terrible
|
|||
15GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 22 21 16 MB/s
|
9.76%
Terrible
|
|||
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
119GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 31 34 29 33 MB/s
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
26GB free, PID 00d2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 73 57 40 67 35 MB/s
|
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
60GB free, PID 0119
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
General USB Flash Disk 125GB
33GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 4.7 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8 MB/s
|
5.57%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 570x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $436 |