Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 03:18
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 823
75% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 106
Parallax 113
98% 113 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 104
Splatting 96.5
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,488
Write 2,200
Mixed 1,456
454% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 68.2
233% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 292
241% 352 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
395GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 483 482 482 481 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 482
Mixed 410
SusWrite 481
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 52.6
170% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
421GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1076 1080 1078 1076 1074 1056 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 1,097
Mixed 1,105
SusWrite 1,073
261% 1,162 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 64
233% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 729
544% 725 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 224%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
168GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 484 483 482 481 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 479
Mixed 397
SusWrite 481
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 52.9
173% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown? CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 31.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback