Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 75.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 844
78% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 102
Parallax 111
93% 109 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 104
Splatting 95.2
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,488
Write 2,193
Mixed 1466
455% 2,049 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 66.5
229% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 291
241% 353 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
394GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 482 482 481 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 478
Mixed 404
SusWrite 482
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 52.4
172% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
421GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 1078 1079 1077 1074 1079 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,091
Mixed 1,118
SusWrite 1,077
261% 1,163 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 75.6
246% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 730
547% 731 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 230%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
117GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 483 482 463 269 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 472
Mixed 397
SusWrite 444
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 52.8
172% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 365
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown? CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 31.8
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback