Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210224
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 09 '21 at 23:06
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 236 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 755 74% 608 Pts	64-Core 1241 77% 1241 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.7% Very good	Lighting 87.3 Reflection 102 Parallax 91.9 71% 93.8 fps	MRender 89.2 Gravity 92 Splatting 94.5 76% 91.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 276GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 605 609 616 613 612 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,259 Write 1083 Mixed 1,023 SusWrite 633 224% 999 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 59 193% 63.4 MB/s	DQ Read 775 DQ Write 511 DQ Mixed 648 482% 644 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 176GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 415 438 441 438 445 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 447 Mixed 424 SusWrite 426 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 43.5 148% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 296 244% 349 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 730GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 410 434 438 393 399 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 440 Mixed 406 SusWrite 408 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 41.7 138% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 310 249% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 257GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 459 463 459 444 285 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 460 Mixed 414 SusWrite 428 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 42.3 144% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 369 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$159 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 459 463 459 461 461 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 462 Mixed 422 SusWrite 460 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 46.5 150% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 368 278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 194 193 194 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 186 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 193 106% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 107%
HP ENVY 7640 series 2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 3 3.1 3.1 3.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.67% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 3 5% 4.52 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 6,151 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.7% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 21.2 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 20.8 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	427x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	66x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	42x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,058

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16