Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171116
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 05 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 145 2-Core 277 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 924 89% 735 Pts	64-Core 1,135 70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.9% Very good	Lighting 91.1 Reflection 89.7 Parallax 83.5 74% 88.1 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 81 Splatting 72.1 70% 88.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-1TM9PGN + 1TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 237% 467GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 519 529 533 654 525 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1591 Write 377 Mixed 1,383 SusWrite 569 217% 980 MB/s	4K Read 57.1 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 69.4 236% 80.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,230 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 954 728% 996 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 313%
Plextor PX-1TM9PY + 1TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 654GB free Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1272 791 548 549 550 554 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1803 Write 1,888 Mixed 1,410 SusWrite 711 326% 1,453 MB/s	4K Read 54.2 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 78.8 255% 89.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,422 DQ Write 930 DQ Mixed 1,054 819% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 279%
Plextor PX-512M9PG + 512GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 403GB free Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1903 1921 1941 1977 1912 1895 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	324% Outstanding	Read 1,855 Write 280 Mixed 1,520 SusWrite 1,925 312% 1,395 MB/s	4K Read 55.7 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 78.8 255% 88.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,426 DQ Write 931 DQ Mixed 1,047 816% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 324% Great: 271%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 274GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 71 72 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 68.7 Write 72.7 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 71.1 49% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 174 175 178 176 177 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 108 Write 71.1 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 175 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 425GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 69 74 74 71 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 97.1 Write 39.6 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 66.5 47% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 175 179 183 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 635 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 2 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 2.4 5% 5.03 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-010.A00G 2x8GB 702 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 21.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 22.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $192Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,523x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	837x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	578x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	404x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	347x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	343x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16