Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5687
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 561
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 372B) 2GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 35.8
32% 37.6 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 25.3
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 245 242 237 226 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.8% Very good
Read 262
Write 248
Mixed 238
SusWrite 225
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 39
131% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 134%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 150
Write 32.3
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 36.3
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5x4GB
5 of 6 slots used
20GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback