| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series |
| Memory | 58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180418 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 03 '21 at 03:21 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
56.4%
Above average
|
49% 82.3 Pts
|
37% 301 Pts
|
29% 462 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
79.5%
Very good
|
81% 102 fps
|
77% 94 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$69
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 428 420 387 348 349 MB/s
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
95% 424 MB/s
|
117% 38.3 MB/s
|
219% 295 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
430GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1618 1149 813 798 794 793 MB/s
|
199%
Outstanding
|
330% 1,474 MB/s
|
146% 49.9 MB/s
|
270% 365 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
52.2%
Above average
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
17% 6.1 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 6x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v21stBench 55%, 214 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 5x |
| GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $177 |