Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 13:01
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 155
58% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 616
54% 462 Pts
64-Core 2,162
134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 38.8
33% 36.9 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 101 102 83 79 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 454
Write 438
Mixed 374
SusWrite 136
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 45.4
140% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 266
200% 266 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST31000524NS 43W7625 42C0400IBM 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: BB28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 129
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 131
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $372
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback