Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA550
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 02 '21 at 07:50
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 143 2-Core 268 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 788 83% 665 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design 8,783 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 200C) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 106 Parallax 110 88% 108 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 102 Splatting 92.6 89% 112 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 90%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1050 869 854 855 854 853 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,769 Write 1,942 Mixed 1,440 SusWrite 889 339% 1,510 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 70.3 222% 72.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,057 DQ Write 388 DQ Mixed 773 558% 739 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 340%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 148GB free Firmware: EXF7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1767 1006 769 783 771 777 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 2,007 Write 1,674 Mixed 1,478 SusWrite 979 344% 1,534 MB/s	4K Read 54 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 66.7 218% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,062 DQ Write 384 DQ Mixed 724 535% 723 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 296%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 1,149 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 38GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 22 34 36 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 173 Write 66.5 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 40.5 100% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.6 142% 3 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 23.2 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 22.3 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2,026x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	849x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	564x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	490x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	425x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	410x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,058x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	255x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	223x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16