MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive5.46% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime21.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 13:13
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 173
52% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 289
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 41
Parallax 38.6
30% 39 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 0.3
18% 25.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 36 33 28 25 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.46% Terrible
Read 41.7
Write 36
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 33
8% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.7
6% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
74GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 81 78 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 81.4
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
11GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 71 69 63 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 102
Write 94.3
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 72.2
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 68%
External USB3.0 DISK01 500GB
198GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 40.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 36.6
50% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK02 500GB
16GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 39.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 5
35% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 38%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
440GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 37.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 0
32% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E45 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817) - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback