Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 20:43
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 758
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2132 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 105
Parallax 81.7
82% 95.6 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 104
Splatting 107
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 417
Write 194
Mixed 247
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 21.9
137% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 18.3
34% 63 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
421GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 132
Write 100
Mixed 100
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.43
104% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 37.9
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 22.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback