MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 21:28
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 877
82% 685 Pts
64-Core 1086
67% 1086 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.1% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 92.9
Parallax 82.3
74% 88.6 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 71.9
66% 81.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1537 1122 580 582 589 587 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 2,296
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 833
388% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 82.3
270% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 963
727% 990 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 280%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
119GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,583
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,656
485% 2,184 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 84.5
275% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 958
718% 973 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 155 155 154 155 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 164
Write 138
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 154
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.7
26% 7.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 125%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 98 100 101 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 98
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
224% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 111%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
60GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 67 59 66 62 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 113
Mixed 96
SusWrite 62.4
150% 129 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 10.8
998% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 12
1,061% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback