MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 878
84% 692 Pts
64-Core 1096
68% 1096 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 81.6
73% 87.2 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 82.7
Splatting 69.9
64% 80.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
251GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 888 870 876 870 873 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,454
Write 2,348
Mixed 1490
SusWrite 914
403% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 84.5
276% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 1,146
870% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 293%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,490
Write 2,014
Mixed 1308
429% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 82.4
270% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,455
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 1,139
868% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 154 152 154 157 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 174
Write 109
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 153
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1.1
28% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 1.8
2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 125%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 76 78 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45% Average
Read 80.6
Write 75.4
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 75.7
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45%
Great: 91%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
155GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 63 62 67 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 119
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 63
121% 111 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 10.7
974% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 12
1,058% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 103%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback