Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 05:56
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 119
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 668
71% 567 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 130
107% 135 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 135
Splatting 119
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,437
Write 2,173
Mixed 1,609
461% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 83.6
280% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 1,033
774% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
418GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 471 428 398 398 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 468
Mixed 383
SusWrite 425
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 56.6
179% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 258
222% 329 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 126%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
629GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 411 410 409 410 396 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 393
Mixed 312
SusWrite 406
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 35.6
136% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 182
174% 272 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 101%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
291GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 273 274 273 276 265 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 396
Write 280
Mixed 324
SusWrite 270
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 23.9
93% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 139
112% 161 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
532GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 95.9
Write 94.2
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 99
121% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
844GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 118 118 119 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 118
143% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
302% 3.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
352% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 25.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback