Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 03:26
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 253
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 697
69% 563 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 135
Parallax 126
103% 129 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 132
Splatting 115
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 581 579 479 530 545 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2391
Write 1,960
Mixed 1,583
SusWrite 560
362% 1,624 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 80.8
272% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,179
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1078
808% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 263%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
458GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 459 458 407 413 406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 157
Mixed 214
SusWrite 432
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 53.6
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 262
196% 268 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
754GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 398 394 409 405 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 410
Mixed 314
SusWrite 401
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 35.9
138% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 184
178% 280 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 101%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
442GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 243 249 231 229 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 425
Write 297
Mixed 324
SusWrite 238
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 27
89% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 143
112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
695GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 120 120 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 97.4
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 119
132% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.2
162% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
590GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 145
Write 128
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 134
162% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 26.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback