bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System AUTOPTAH61N
MotherboardIntel DH61BE
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 526
60% 467 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Nvidia(10DE 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 47.5
30% 43.4 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 45
Splatting 36.5
35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 166 155 154 166 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 207
Write 159
Mixed 165
SusWrite 160
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 46.5
DQ Mixed 29.7
25% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 82%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
92GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 85 85 85 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 69.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 86.1
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA380 320GB
12GB free
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 80 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76.3
Write 80.9
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 80.7
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF Micron ITC 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback