PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B75M-D2V (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131114 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 19 '21 at 08:30 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3450 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 28 47 12 3.3 37 MB/s
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
110GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 29 48 14 3.9 37 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
88GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 87 87 87 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 64x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 63x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 53x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |