| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series |
| Memory | 60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180418 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '21 at 23:23 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
57%
Above average
|
53% 89 Pts
|
40% 322 Pts
|
29% 463 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
3.47%
Terrible
|
3% 4.2 fps
|
4% 4.27 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$69
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 421 352 356 355 354 MB/s
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
97% 431 MB/s
|
131% 44.9 MB/s
|
239% 320 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1961 974 807 810 811 810 MB/s
|
211%
Outstanding
|
350% 1,561 MB/s
|
160% 57.2 MB/s
|
307% 410 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
53.9%
Above average
|
60% 21.2 GB/s
|
20% 7.1 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 6x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v21stBench 55%, 214 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 5x |
| GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $177 |