Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus G73Jh  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 19:13
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 80
48% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 199
19% 159 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.683.0.0
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 9.6
10% 10.8 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 48 46 49 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 42
Write 50.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 48.7
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 60%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
54GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 48 48 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 64
Mixed 41
SusWrite 48.4
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32%
Great: 58%
ST500LT012-9WS14 500GB
45GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 21.6
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback