Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 03:36
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 194
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 615
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200713
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 20 28 17 71 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 483
Write 9.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 38.6
31% 147 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 14.3
103% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 18
63% 133 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
29GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 168 161 143 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 157
Mixed 31
SusWrite 159
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 103%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
21GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 53
Write 61.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 58.8
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
39GB free
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 56 58 52 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 89
Write 89.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 56.9
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.4 2 1.5 1.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 31.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 1.5
8% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
100% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 17%
Generic Flash-Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.2 6.3 4.8 4.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Read 14
Write 5.8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.7
10% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RZX-D4D17M2400B-16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 17.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback