Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E7440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 18:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 82.4
41% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 79.8
8-Core 139
13% 109 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 5
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SFAT-128G-1122 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 36 32 32 42 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 394
Write 53.6
Mixed 296
SusWrite 68.9
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.9
36% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 65.4
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 0.6
30% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
172GB free
Firmware: 0010SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 75.7
Write 82.7
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 87.8
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Kingston KNWMX1-ETB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback