Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 192%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$295
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 306
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,185
105% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,180
73% 1,180 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
Gigabyte(1458 403D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 244
Parallax 275
222% 264 fps
MRender 306
Gravity 228
Splatting 169
184% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,157
Write 1211
Mixed 630
222% 999 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 55.9
202% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 974
797% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
346GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1528 1539 1554 1539 232 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 924
Write 1,506
Mixed 1023
SusWrite 1,092
258% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 68.4
238% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 1,436
DQ Mixed 921
736% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 223%
Great: 305%
Drappers 1TB 1TB
585GB free
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 361 411 396 398 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 482
Write 363
Mixed 354
SusWrite 372
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 22.8
109% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 39.8
83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 94%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
321GB free
Firmware: MX15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 92 92 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.4
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 90.1
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 63 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 87.3
Write 77.9
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 62.8
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
824GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 173 171 171 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 158
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 170
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 37.2
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 32.5
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $839
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback