Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 190% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 179% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '21 at 12:14
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 295 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 1,085 100% 835 Pts	64-Core 1,097 68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	189% Outstanding	Lighting 276 Reflection 242 Parallax 272 225% 263 fps	MRender 305 Gravity 227 Splatting 168 184% 233 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 323 325 325 322 295 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1,350 Write 1,231 Mixed 529 SusWrite 362 193% 868 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 60.8 207% 75.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,311 DQ Write 1,218 DQ Mixed 743 701% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 236%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB 30,033 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 247GB free Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1564 1562 731 140 159 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 995 Write 1,521 Mixed 1,068 SusWrite 716 243% 1,075 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 74.2 254% 95.7 MB/s	DQ Read 623 DQ Write 1,432 DQ Mixed 928 735% 994 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 305%
Drappers 1TB 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 395GB free Firmware: S1024A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 370 421 421 421 426 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 478 Write 375 Mixed 357 SusWrite 391 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 24.2 118% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 38.8 87% 175 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 94%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB 5,105 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 321GB free Firmware: MX15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 102 104 102 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 10.7 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 99.8 45% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 60 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 84.8 Write 83.7 Mixed 47 SusWrite 60.1 51% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 824GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 173 171 170 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 156 Mixed 105 SusWrite 171 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 109%
pny USB 2.0 FD 16GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 005d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 18.4 12% 18.4 MB/s	4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 4x8GB 9,005 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 47.1 MC Mixed 36.9 122% 42.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 51.3 SC Mixed 31.6 99% 34.7 GB/s	Latency 56.8 70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,617x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,478x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,143x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	683x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	481x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	382x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $796

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16