Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 05:56
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,018
96% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 169
Parallax 106
87% 127 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 96
Splatting 92.4
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 480GB SSD 480GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 237 264 267 268 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 485
Write 435
Mixed 363
SusWrite 277
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 24.8
130% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 33.5
73% 148 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST4000VX007 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: MFAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 162 161 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 160
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 161
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA42UH-MIC1U22T2 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 21.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback