MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 09:41
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,043
97% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,982
123% 1,982 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
521GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 202 157 108 118 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 398
Mixed 748
SusWrite 198
206% 955 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 80.9
265% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 849
637% 845 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 231%
Great: 410%
SSD 240GB
111GB free
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 256 257 256 255 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 372
Write 350
Mixed 274
SusWrite 264
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 25.5
65% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 152
109% 140 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 96 98 98 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 57.4
Write 125
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 96.6
55% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.7
326% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC9D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 171 169 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 151
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 170
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95%
Great: 113%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 35
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 1.1
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 62%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB
129GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 27.6
Write 37
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 19.9
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.7
248% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 59%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
829GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 33.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 17.9
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 74%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 37.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 2.6
35% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 74%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
890GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 33.4
Write 37
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 2
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
274% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.8
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 1.1
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
3TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 39
Write 37.2
Mixed 31.9
46% 36 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 2.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,043
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback