MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 04:20
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,086
100% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,984
123% 1,984 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 154
Parallax 171
127% 160 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 130
Splatting 117
115% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,480
Write 691
Mixed 1,789
363% 1,653 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 77.3
250% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 723
543% 721 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
SSD 240GB
111GB free
Firmware: SBFM91.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 411
Write 378
Mixed 341
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 32.7
136% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 153
110% 140 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79.6
Write 92.9
Mixed 24.7
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.6
308% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC9D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 166
Write 146
Mixed 74.4
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.3
Write 37.2
Mixed 30.9
45% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 62%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB
129GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.6
Write 37
Mixed 11.2
33% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 2
258% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 59%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 30.8
44% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 74%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
2TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39
Write 37.7
Mixed 31.9
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
274% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.1
Write 37.8
Mixed 34.6
47% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.2
199% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
3TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 38.1
Write 39.3
Mixed 33.7
48% 37 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 2.6 MB/s
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
1TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.3
Write 37.2
Mixed 32.4
45% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.7
268% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 29.1
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,043
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback