MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 04:53
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 299
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,088
101% 841 Pts
64-Core 2,031
126% 2,031 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 153
Parallax 155
127% 155 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 131
Splatting 117
115% 145 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
478GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1251 1094 1337 1556 739 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 2,342
Mixed 1,832
SusWrite 1,007
427% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 78.5
254% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 692
533% 720 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 271%
Great: 410%
SSD 240GB
111GB free
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 256 256 258 260 258 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 401
Write 414
Mixed 318
SusWrite 266
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 33.6
134% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 114
92% 128 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 127 126 127 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 89.6
Write 108
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 126
62% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.6
306% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC9D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 167 169 168 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 167
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 113%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.76% Terrible
Read 39.1
Write 33.8
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 2.5
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.76%
Great: 62%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB
129GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 25.1
Write 33
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 2.4
24% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.3
257% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 59%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 34
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 19.4
40% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 74%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 31.6
Write 33.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 18.5
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
274% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 39.4
Write 38.8
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 21.9
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 38.1
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 2.3
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 2.53 MB/s
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 33
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 18.5
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 28.9
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 26.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,043
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback