RM ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRM ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I LX/RM/SI
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 14:25
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500T
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 81
2-Core 154
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 251
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 31.6
19% 29.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 16
Splatting 19.9
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 218 35 39 25 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 250
Write 231
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 77.6
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 23.1
68% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 22.7
33% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 86%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 24TB
22TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 62 54 51 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 131
Mixed 116
SusWrite 57
19% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 1.5
21% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 5.9
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 3.9
5% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: RM ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback