| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190529 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 09 '21 at 22:26 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.2%
Very good
|
76% 134 Pts
|
55% 411 Pts
|
26% 415 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 37.4 fps
|
26% 32.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 71 48 90 16 47 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
42% 187 MB/s
|
52% 13.7 MB/s
|
28% 58 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
640GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 180 182 185 185 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
116% 158 MB/s
|
152% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.1%
Good
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
52% 76.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,988 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 417x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 241x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $74Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 220x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 284x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 220x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 195x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $176 |