Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte B450 AORUS M (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 08:52
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 205 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 605 59% 484 Pts	64-Core 783 48% 783 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1078 982 723 452 326 461 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 2,332 Write 1,991 Mixed 1,602 SusWrite 670 368% 1,649 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 67.1 220% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 819 DQ Write 545 DQ Mixed 729 531% 697 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 372%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 56GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 67 68 68 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 104 Write 83.3 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 67.1 58% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 318GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 76 76 77 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 80.7 Write 77.1 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 76.8 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 69%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 250GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 188GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 94 101 101 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 108 Write 99.7 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 97.9 125% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 139%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 35.5 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 29.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 7,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,317x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	559x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	502x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	430x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	425x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	202x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	171x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	166x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	417x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	274x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	249x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $430

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16