Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 540
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.7
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 218 217 205 220 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 343
Write 265
Mixed 292
SusWrite 216
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 31.9
128% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 250
192% 259 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Ts120gss D220S 120GB
33GB free
Firmware: SBFR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 225 260 227 235 265 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.5% Average
Read 146
Write 96.1
Mixed 116
SusWrite 237
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 15.1
58% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 97.9
75% 101 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
388GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 114 115 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback