MSI MS-17E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-17E1  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 10:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 704
74% 594 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1266) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 126
Parallax 106
82% 111 fps
MRender 89.2
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 105
81% 97.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reletech M.2 SSD 1024GB
498GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2184 768 864 719 763 819 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 629
Write 690
Mixed 553
SusWrite 1,019
164% 723 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 26.5
116% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 60.2
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 939
578% 605 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 142%
Great: 313%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
402GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 66 71 65 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 78.1
Write 52.4
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 66.7
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.7
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback