Asrock H570M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 10:06
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$233
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 174
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 543
53% 437 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 178
Parallax 168
161% 181 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 140
Splatting 117
114% 143 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 136%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 421 423 423 422 419 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 1,548
Mixed 1,119
SusWrite 497
255% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55.8
182% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 680
501% 661 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 171%
Great: 237%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
95GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 397 382 358 348 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 437
Mixed 338
SusWrite 370
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 35.1
124% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 325
247% 334 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
200GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 149 148 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 149
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 148
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 114%
I-O DATA HDCZ-UT 3TB
412GB free, PID 016c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 31.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 8.6
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 72%
I-O DATA HDCZ-UT 3TB
101GB free, PID 016c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 34.5
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 8.5
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB
56GB free, PID 027e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 35.3
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 8.6
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
21GB free, PID 0228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 32.7
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 8.5
35% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 20%
BUFFALO External HDD 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 02c1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 33.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 8.5
34% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
226% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 79%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB
3GB free, PID 0108
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 36.8
Mixed 23.6
31% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FJ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 21.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $507
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback