Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 12:59
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 280
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,011
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 100
Parallax 91.1
85% 98.4 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 78.2
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1265 1624 1518 1450 1449 1426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,595
Write 2,338
Mixed 1,862
SusWrite 1,455
462% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 94.3
306% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,239
934% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 344%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
73GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 493 492 492 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 488
Mixed 427
SusWrite 492
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 67.2
224% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
195GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 999 1000 1000 1001 1002 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,517
Write 1,404
Mixed 1344
SusWrite 1,033
298% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 75.5
260% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,450
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 1,326
998% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 264%
Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 172 168 177 173 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 126
Write 154
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 168
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C17-8GTZR Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 F4-3600C17-8GTZR Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 48GB
3400, 3400, 3400, 3400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 34.3
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 35.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback