Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 15:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 142
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 374
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA032HMCD-000L1 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: AXM18L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 90 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 234
Write 93
Mixed 122
SusWrite 90.4
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 10.8
41% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 18.8
27% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 32%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 93 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 95.8
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 90.6
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-071.A00LF 99U5428-065.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback