Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 122
56% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 68.9
54% 67.9 fps
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 65.3
59% 66.9 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 70 70 57 45 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 316
Write 173
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 69
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 14
62% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 66.5
DQ Mixed 3.1
27% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 66%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
176GB free
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 411 399 424 430 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 302
Write 34.9
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 359
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 10.2
50% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 23.8
17% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 99%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
307GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 79 79 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 80.6
Write 62.1
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 77.8
89% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 17.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback