Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 135
57% 94 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 204
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 62.8
53% 65.2 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 62.5
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 82 77 51 64 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 291
Write 341
Mixed 319
SusWrite 91.2
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 16.8
82% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 28.3
59% 117 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 66%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
176GB free
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 402 410 419 421 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 398
Write 212
Mixed 373
SusWrite 375
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 34.4
121% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 143
117% 166 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 99%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
307GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 79 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 77
Write 61
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 77.9
88% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 17.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback