Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 601
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 53.7
40% 54.5 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 55.8
47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 107 94 68 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 430
Write 107
Mixed 147
SusWrite 78.7
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 17.4
75% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 65.8
62% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
590GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 106 109 104 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 97.7
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 106
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 71%
WD easystore 25FC 1TB
259GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 75 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 76.1
74% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback