ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock J4005B-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock J4005B-ITX (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180504
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '21 at 22:49
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 39 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 111 38% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 111 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.63 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 322 360 382 386 391 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 208 Write 104 Mixed 221 SusWrite 361 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 36.6 125% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 212 167% 232 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 102%
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 136GB free Firmware: 4PC10302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 153 159 161 163 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 226 Write 162 Mixed 153 SusWrite 152 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 17.5 61% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 66.9 DQ Mixed 61.1 56% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 51%
Storejet Transcend 120GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 23GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 92 113 67 67 75 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 263 Write 117 Mixed 128 SusWrite 81.5 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 18.5 54% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 87.3 DQ Mixed 93.1 72% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD 2x4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical J4005B-ITX Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4005B-ITX

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	14x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	11x
RX 560AMD $500Bench 22%, 60,738 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
HyperX 120GBKingstonBench 67%, 3,401 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	1x

RAM
9905700-026.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 72%, 411 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	2x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 26%, 50 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback