Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 184
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 409
43% 343 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 94.5
Parallax 85.4
69% 88.3 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 77.8
74% 92.8 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 146 141 134 128 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 228
Mixed 260
SusWrite 154
107% 497 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 35.6
144% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 245
254% 436 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 131%
Great: 228%
Jmicron Tech 480GB
330GB free
Firmware: 0407
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 262 322 259 278 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 158
Write 96.8
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 290
36% 157 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 9.4
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 14.6
12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.6% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 20.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback